|
Caretakers get hints on handling children seized in Texas
By The Associated Press Sun Apr 27, 3:15 AM ET
From Amarillo
to Houston, children removed from a polygamist ranch in west Texas are settling into new surroundings, and caretakers
are getting cultural pointers on how to deal with them - such as no television, no movies, no radio and nothing red.
"The color 'RED' is not acceptable for clothing," said a memo that the Texas Department of Family and Protective
Services sent to caretakers at shelters and group homes for the 462 children seized this month from the Yearning for
Zion ranch after a tip about possible abuse.
The ranch was established
by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and sect
members believe red is reserved for Jesus Christ, according to officials in Utah.
So workers at the children's
shelter in San Antonio spent part of the week taking anything red off the
walls and floors.
Another memo from state officials
to caretakers describes the children's dietary and clothing needs.
Some officials said they were
sensitive to potential culture shock among the children, who led a sheltered life on the ranch near Eldorado.
"Help them with self-esteem, guilty feelings, shame, confusion about mainstream culture, and learning basic decision making skills," said another memo
to caretakers.
As the children began settling
into foster homes Saturday, sect leader Willie Jessop sent a letter asking Gov. Rick
Perry to "block the separation of our 437 children from their mothers," the Houston
Chronicle reported.
"The Texas Department of Family and
Protective Services have demonstrated, in a most blatant way, their inability to properly care for, or even account for our children. Many have been left in critical medical conditions, resulting in permanent mental
damage through threats, intimidation, and ultimately separating them from their parents," Jessop wrote.
A Corpus
Christi attorney who represents two mothers from the polygamist retreat alleges child welfare authorities
cannot account for two boys. The boys, a 16-month-old and 11 year-old, are not on any of the state's placement lists, said
attorney Rebecca Flanigan, with Texas Rio
Grande Legal Aid in Corpus Christi.
Child welfare officials told
the Corpus Christi Caller-Times that no children have been lost, but that
parent-child relationships have been difficult to determine. Department of Family and Protective Services spokesman Patrick
Crimmins said he is not aware of children being unaccounted for at this point.
The letter by Jessop accuses
Child Protective Services of misrepresenting conditions and making false allegations against the Fundamentalist
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
It called removal of the children
from the sect's compound "some of the most horrific violations of human rights that have ever been allowed on American soil."
The last bus loads of children
from the group left the San Angelo Coliseum on Friday, headed for shelters
and group homes around the state. One bus had to stop several times on the way to Brazoria County, south of Houston, because
some of the children got motion sickness.
"Some of them probably haven't
even ridden in a vehicle before," state trooper Dial King told the Houston Chronicle.
Near Amarillo, Cal Farley's Boys Ranch
took in 18 more boys on Friday, bringing to 72 the number of FLDS children under its care. Dan Adams, chief executive of the
ranch, said staffers got pointers to help them understand the dress, food and cultural ways of the children.
A judge awarded custody of
the children to the state after child-welfare officials argued they could be in danger in Eldorado, where officials say young
girls were forced to marry much older men and bear their children.
State officials hope that
removing the children far from the ranch may make them more willing to speak freely about even such basic things as their names and ages.
"The children are in a position
to no longer on a daily basis be influenced by adults who have encouraged a code of silence," said Darrell Azar, a spokesman for Child Protective Services. "Now that they are away from that influence
they may become more comfortable, and we will have a better chance of learning the truth."
source site: click here



spiritual abuse
are you involved in a fundamental religious group?
is it important for you to have a close walk w/God?
have you been experiencing painful life transitions?
are you emotionally very needy now in this point of your life?
read about spiritual abuse objectively because it's a struggle to evaluate your spiritual situation when you need it so badly.
Characteristics
of Spiritual Abuse are well-documented,
not only in recent literature, but also in church history, & even in the Bible itself. It's not limited to groups w/heretical doctrines or wierd beliefs. As Ronald Enroth
writes:
... spiritual
abuse can take place in the context of doctrinally sound,
Bible-preaching, fundamentalist, conservative Christianity. All that's needed for abuse is a pastor accountable to no one & therefore beyond confrontation. [Churches That Abuse, p. 189.]
Few people can readily identify Spiritual
Abuse when they see it.
It's due to the fact that in varying degrees, the individual components of Spiritual Abuse are
pervasively present in the church itself. As Enroth also writes:
... tendencies toward
abusive styles of leadership are more prevalent than most Christians realize. [Churches That Abuse, p. 205.]
Spiritually abusive leaders have an element of familiarity on their side as they lure people into their groups. Few people
will join a group whose abuse is obvious. Conditioning new members to the abusive environment is simply a matter of gradually intensifying the following characteristics over time:



Black & white thinking
We all need an anchor for our souls. We all need to know that there are some things that are really true, that
we can really count on & on which we can truly base our lives. God has given each of us a need for stability in our lives & He has also provided a
solid foundation on which we can rest our souls.
This is why the Bible teaches that there are things that are always
right & there are things that are always wrong. Moral absolutes do exist; of this we can be sure.
There are things that are always true & things that are always false. Absolute truth also exists. The same God who created the need for these things within us has also met this need in His word.
The spiritual abuser also knows that people need a strong foundation for their lives & so he is quick
to offer one, too. The problem is that the foundation that the spiritual abuser lays is
different from the one found in the Bible.
The foundation that God lays for us in the Bible is simple: it's Christ Himself (1 Cor. 3:11). If anyone lays any other foundation, such as the foundation of one's own authority, or one's own "prophecies,"
or one's own opinions, or one's own preferences, he or she has laid a false
foundation.
The foundation that God lays allows for personal freedom in lifestyle choices. It doesn't lay restrictions on what people eat, drink, what they wear, what
holy days to observe or not to observe (Rom. 14:1-6).
While God's foundation acknowledges that there are absolutes, not everything is an absolute.
While some things are always right & some things are always wrong, not everything is always either one or the other. God
doesn't treat his people like little children, giving them detailed instructions for every little decision in life. He
treats us like adults, expecting us to make many decisions on our own.
Thus there are "gray areas." There are "disputable matters," & you have no right to dictate your own personal decisions on these matters to me, nor
I to you.
In a spiritually abusive group, many things in the gray areas are pigeon-holed as either "right" or "wrong," either
"good" or "evil," & many disputable matters are classified as either "black" or "white."
No allowance is made for "middle ground" in these areas. This is also referred to as "polarized" thinking, because nearly every issue is interpreted
as having only 2 possible answers, both of which are polar opposites of each other.
Spiritually abusive groups leave very little room in between the 2 extremes, thus crowding out both personal freedom & the operation of God's Spirit in the life of the individual.
Since most people can see thru the faulty logic of this approach, this "black & white"
mentality has to be foisted on group members gradually, even seductively, over a period of time.
In the beginning, new members are impressed with the "brave stands" that the leadership takes on certain issues. Usually an explanation is given that certain things must
be forbidden to group members, not because they're necessarily evil in & of themselves, but because they "might cause
members to stumble."
They have "evil potential," therefore they must be avoided.
Other times the leadership manages to persuade the members that these things really are evil in & of themselves,
but only the leadership is "spiritually mature" enough to "discern" the evil.
Very often prohibitions are "customized" for various individuals in the group. i.e., The leadership may "discern"
that a particular member has a "spiritual problem." This "spiritual problem" may supposedly have something to do with
watching certain TV shows.
So the leader bans the person from watching any TV. Or it may have something to do with shopping, so the
leader requires the person's spouse to do all the shopping from now on. There have even been cases of leaders who order
married couples to stop having sex.
One time a member of my group requested help managing his personal finances & our leader assigned me the job of
helping him. I met with this young man, helped him put together a budget & then dutifully reported back to the leader.
I informed him that this young man's budget allocated about 10% per month for the purpose of paying off his credit card
debt & another 10% for savings.
"Why didn't you allocate all 20% to
pay off the credit card?" the leader asked.
"Because I was taught that when you
budget, you need to save, as well as re-pay your debts," I replied.
"Don't you realize what you just told
him?" he asked.
"What?"
"You just told him he can live however
he pleases!" the leader retorted, glaring at me in disapproval.
The leader's sudden, forceful, left-hand-turn in logic left me speechless. It was a move designed to knock me
off-balance. It wasn't true, but it accomplished his purpose of disorienting me & giving him the upper hand. (It was an example of another manipulative ploy: "turning-the-tables.")
In the black & white, polarized thinking of our group, all debt was totally evil & members were expected to pay off all loans & charge accounts as quickly as possible. Scripture verses were twisted out of
their contexts in order to support this teaching.
Thus my leader felt justified in accusing me of giving this young man a license to go out & sin, even though I was helping him pay off
his credit card & save money. In a black-&-white system of thinking, there can be no middle ground.
My action must have either been totally good, or totally evil & he chose the latter.
Perhaps you can think of examples of extremely polarized thinking in your abusive group. We Christians are especially vulnerable to this, because we believe in moral absolutes. We feel alienated as we make our way thru a world which believes that morals (if they exist at
all) are relative & "right" & "wrong" can change
with each situation.
We naturally gravitate toward those who agree with us. Spiritual abusers come offering us
relief from the onslaught of moral relativism. They offer to eliminate confusing gray areas & simplify our choices for us. They draw hard-&-fast boundaries for us to help us make sure that we always "color inside the lines."
They sound like the good guys. But they're not.
An esoteric approach to truth
I am indebted to my good friend, Wheaton College Professor Emeritus
Dr. Morris Inch for bringing this manipulative technique to my attention.
Even though it's one of the more obvious features of both cults &
spiritual abuse, this one is often difficult for people to describe.
"Esoteric" can mean either "intended for or understood by only a chosen few, as an inner group of disciples or initiates
(said of ideas, doctrines, literature, etc.)" or "beyond the understanding or knowledge of most people" (Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Edition, 1988, p. 464).
The latter definition is virtually synonymous w/the meaning of "mystical,"
& many spiritually abusive groups are mystical,
but it's the former definition that applies most frequently.
Spiritually abusive groups have their own doctrines & their own in-house jargon which they claim can only
be truly understand by those who "truly belong." Such people are the only ones who are "true Christians."
These groups love to quote the Apostle Paul's
words:
But a natural man doesn't accept
the things of the Spirit of God, for they're foolishness to him & he can't understand them, because they're spiritually appraised.
[1 Corinthians 2:14, NASB]
If you don't understand what the group teaches, you must be "a natural man" (literally, "an unspiritual man," NASB margin; or a "man w/out
the Spirit," NIV). It must be because you don't
have God's Holy Spirit. Therefore, you must not be a Christian.
The only problem with using that verse this way is that it's not what Paul
meant. Anyone who reads the whole chapter thru from the beginning will quickly realize that "the things of the Spirit
of God" don't refer to just any teaching, much less the peculiar teachings of a spiritually abusive group.
In the context of 1 Corinthians 2, "the things of the Spirit of God" refers specifically to the Gospel of Jesus Christ,
the Good News of His death on the cross for our sins.
The reason that "the things of the Spirit of God" concerning the cross of Christ are "foolishness" to the "natural man" is because he rejects them & refuses to appraise them from God's point of view, not because they are intellectually
unintelligible to everyone except believers.
This is what Paul is actually saying in the context. Spiritually abusive groups will never encourage you to read the surrounding context of the verses they quote, because if you did, you'd figure out that they're
twisting the Scriptures.
In my group, the leader would cloak his meaning in buzz-words from pop-psychology. Other groups usually confuse new members with spiritual-sounding clichés. No matter how long you're a member, you never seem to really
master the in-house jargon.
This is often because the leadership is careful never to give fully -understandable definitions of the terms it uses. This way it can always keep you off-balance, so that if you ever step out of line, it can always quote verses like 1 Corinthians 2:14 in order to frighten you back into submission.
Sometimes leaders will also appeal to the fact that Jesus spoke in parables. They
don't mention that Jesus also explained His parables to His disciples. He clarified
their meaning. Why don't spiritual
abusers do the same?
While Jesus was concerned w/teaching people, spiritual
abusers are concerned with controlling people by keeping them confused.
It goes beyond the mere use of jargon. These groups have an esoteric approach to "truth" in general. Unlike the authors of the Bible, who go out of their way to make things clear to their readers,
spiritual abusers make things unclear & confusing.
True understanding always seems just slightly out of your reach. Others in the group pretend to understand & perhaps you pretend as well. Eventually you figure out that they're just as perplexed as you
are, even though they'll never say so as long as they wish to remain members.



This information was obtained
from a wheel developed by Jeri Gray-Reneberg, M.Div., for the Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department; modeled upon the
"Power & Control" wheels, Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project.
I want to make
sure that everyone understands that these bible verses don't in any way promote male power & control over women. It's when they are taken out of context & twisted that they become tools of an abusive spirit.
Power & Control of Women in a Patriarchal Society:
Using Coercion & Threats:
1 Timothy 2:12
I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.
Using Intimidation:
1 Peter 3:7
Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them
with respect as the weaker partner and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers.
Isaiah 3:12
Youths oppress my people, women rule over them. O
my people, your guides lead you astray; they turn you from the path.

Using Emotional Abuse:
Titus 2:3-5
Likewise, teach the older women to be reverent in the
way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to much wine, but to teach what is good. Then they can train the younger women
to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to
their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God.
1 Timothy 2:13-14
For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not
the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
1 Corinthians 14:35
If they want to inquire about something, they should
ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.
Revelation 14:4
These are those who did not defile themselves with
women, for they kept themselves pure. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among men and offered
as firstfruits to God and the Lamb.
Ezekiel 16:37-41
...therefore I am going to gather all your lovers,
with whom you found pleasure, those you loved as well as those you hated. I will gather them against you from all around and
will strip you in front of them, and they will see all your nakedness. I will sentence you to the punishment of women who
commit adultery and who shed blood; I will bring upon you the blood vengeance of my wrath and jealous anger. Then I will hand
you over to your lovers, and they will tear down your mounds and destroy your lofty shrines. They will strip you of your clothes
and take your fine jewelry and leave you naked and bare. They will bring a mob against you, who will stone you and hack you
to pieces with their swords. They will burn down your houses and inflict punishment on you in the sight of many women. I will
put a stop to your prostitution, and you will no longer pay your lovers.

Using Isolation:
1 Timothy 2:11
A woman should learn in quietness and full submission.
1 Corinthians 14:33b-34
As in all the congregations of the saints, women should
remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says.
Leviticus 12:2b-5
...a woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to
a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days, just as she is unclean during her monthly period. On the eighth day the
boy is to be circumcised. Then the woman must wait thirty-three days to be purified from her bleeding. She must not touch
anything sacred or go to the sanctuary until the days of her purification are over. If she gives birth to a daughter, for
two weeks the woman will be unclean, as during her period. Then she must wait sixty-six days to be purified from her bleeding.

Minimizing, Denying & Blaming:
1 Timothy 2:14
And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman
who was deceived and became a sinner.
John 8:3--5
The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in
a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the
act of adultery. In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?"
Using Children:
1 Timothy 2:15
But women will be saved through childbearing - if they
continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.
Genesis 19:4-8
Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every
part of the city of Sodom - both young and old - surrounded the house. They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to
you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."
Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him and
said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring
them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the
protection of my roof."
Using Male Privilege:
Ephesians 5:22-24
Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For
the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church
submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the
Lord.
1 Peter 3:1-6
Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands
so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives, when they
see the purity and reverence of your lives. Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the
wearing of gold jewelry and fine clothes. Instead, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and
quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God's sight. For this is the way the holy women of the past who put their hope in
God used to make themselves beautiful. They were submissive to their own husbands, like Sarah, who obeyed Abraham and called
him her master. You are her daughters if you do what is right and do not give way to fear.
Deuteronomy 22:30
A man is not to marry his father's wife; he must not
dishonor his father's bed.
Proverbs 28:16a
A tyrannical ruler lacks judgement
Women as Property:
Judges 19:22-29
While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked
men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, "Bring out the
man who came to your house so we can have sex with him."
The owner of the house went outside and said to them, "No, my
friends, don't be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don't do this disgraceful thing. Look, here is my virgin daughter,
and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But to this man,
don't do such a disgraceful thing."
But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his concubine
and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. At daybreak
the woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down at the door and lay there until daylight.
When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of
the house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine, fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands
on the threshold. He said to her, "Get up; let's go." But there was no answer. Then the man put her on his donkey and set
out for home.
When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine,
limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel.
Deuteronomy 22:13-21
If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes
her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, "I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof
of her virginity," then the girl's father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate.
The girl's father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered
her and said, 'I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.' But here is the proof of my daughter's virginity." Then her parents
shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him. They shall fine him
a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the girl's father, because this man has given an Israelite virgin a bad name.
She shall continue to be his wife; he must not divorce her as long as he lives.
If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity
can be found, she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death.
She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil
from among you.
Numbers 5:11-31
Then the Lord said to Moses, "Speak to the Israelites
and say to them;'If a man's wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him by sleeping with another man, and this is hidden from
her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act),
and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure - or if he is jealous and suspects
her even though she is not impure - then he is to take his wife to the priest. He must also take an offering of a tenth of
an ephah of barley flour on her behalf. He must not pour oil on it or put incense on it, because it is a grain offering for
jealousy, a reminder offering to draw attention to guilt.
The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord.
Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. After the priest
has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder offering, the grain
offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. Then the priest shall put the woman under
oath and say to her, "If no other man has slept with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your
husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. But if you have gone astray while married to your husband
and you have defiled yourself by sleeping with a man other than your husband" - here the priest is to put the woman under
this curse of the oath - "may the Lord cause your people to curse and denounce you when he causes your thigh to waste away
and your abdomen to swell. May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells and your thigh wastes
away." Then the woman is to say, "Amen. So be it."
The priest is to write these curses on a scroll and then wash
them off into the bitter water. He shall have the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and this water will enter
her and cause bitter suffering. The priest is to take from her hands the grain offering for jealousy, wave it before the Lord
and bring it to the altar. The priest is then to take a handful of the grain offering as a memorial offering and burn it on
the altar; after that, he is to have the woman drink the water. If she has defiled herself and been unfaithful to her husband,
then when she is made to drink the water that brings a curse, it will go into her an cause bitter suffering; her abdomen will
swell and her thigh waste away, and she will become accursed among her people. If, however, the woman has not defiled herself
and is free from impurity, she will be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.
This, then, is the law of jealousy when a woman goes astray
and defiles herself while married to her husband, or when feelings of jealousy come over a man because he suspects his wife.
The priest is to have her stand before the Lord and is to apply this entire law to her. The husband will be innocent of any
wrongdoing, but the woman will bear the consequences of her sin.
|
 |
|
Scripture Twisting
I already
gave examples of how spiritually abusive groups twist the Scriptures in my discussions of their black & white thinking & their esoteric approach to truth.
Twisting
of Scripture is a manipulative technique that's especially prominent in spiritually abusive groups. Unlike full-blown
cults spiritually abusive groups tend to be composed primarily of Christians, who usually require a Biblical basis for what they
believe & practice. Spiritual abusers must use a small but significant basis of bible truth to satisfy that need in their victims.
In his book Scripture Twisting James W. Sire has helpfully catalogued the top 20 ways that cults misread the Bible & I
have seen nearly every one of those methods used in spiritually abusive
groups that were supposedly Christian.
In the group that I was involved with for 5-1/2 years, loved to quote
the words of Jesus in Matthew 10:34-37:
"Do not suppose that
I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn 'a man
against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law-a man's enemies will be the
members of his own household.'" "Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me
is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; "
[Matthew
10:34-37, NIV]
The only problem is, the leader used these verses in order to separate
us from our families!
Following the instructions of our leader, who persuaded me that I needed to break off contact from my family because I needed to "recover" from their "corruption," I spent 3 years totally separated from my family, all of whom lived within
a few miles of me.
During that time, I missed the births of nieces & nephews & the funerals of relatives. I refused to
come to any birthday or holiday celebrations. I'd allowed myself to be totally cut off from them, interrupted only by
the occasional surprise phone call or unannounced visit from one of my brothers, for 3 years.
I'd forgotten a simple principle of biblical interpretation:
always compare Scripture with Scripture. Never take one verse & read it outside of the context of the entire Bible. For
it was Jesus who also said:
And he [Jesus] said to them:
"You have a fine
way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions! For Moses
said, 'Honor your father & your mother,' & 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.'
But you say that
if a man says to his father or mother: 'Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is Corban' (that is, a gift devoted to God), then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. Thus you nullify the
word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that."
[Mark 10:9-13, NIV;
see also Matthew 3:15}
Jesus was referring to a way in which the Pharisees had manipulated a legitimate part of God's Law thru their teachings so that it allowed
people to disobey one of God's most basic commandments: to honor mother & father.
Likewise, the leader of our group had manipulated Jesus' teaching in Matthew
10:34-37, which simply taught that we should love God above all others, into virtually the same error that the
Pharisees had committed!
When spiritual abusers misuse, misrepresent, or otherwise misinterpret the Bible, 90% of
the time you can cut thru all their confusing rhetoric & twisted reasoning by asking 3 simple questions:
- What was the original author actually saying
to his audience?
- What was this author, who was writing under
the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, saying to all believers?
- What is God saying to us thru this text?
If the Scriptures are being interpreted correctly, the answers to all 3 of these questions will be consistent with each other.
There'll be no "mysterious underlying meaning." It'll all make perfect sense. If someone comes to your house & claims that you must "meditate" in order to "go far deeper" than the surface-meaning of the text & that they themselves have come up with unique
understandings of particular verses "thru prayer & fasting," I'd be sure to count the silverware after they left.
They probably lie about other things, too
Manipulation
by: Ron Henzel
Did you ever have the experience of being in a Christian group in which
every time you brought a matter of concern to the spiritual leadership they found a way to turn it around
& make it your problem?
After joining this group, did you find yourself doing things they wanted you to do, which, if
they had told you right up front that this would be a requirement for membership, you'd never have joined in the first place?
Did they have an uncanny ability to make it seem like it was your idea
to do these things, as if it was by your own free choice, even though you really didn't want to do them?
Did they always keep you guessing about what they really meant by what they said?
Did they use special jargon that you could never quite fully figure out?
Did the leader frequently silence people's objections by "coming out of left field" w/statements or questions or accusations
that left people baffled?
Did he always seem to have a "trump card" he could use if his judgment was questioned & if worst came to worst, he could always find a way to pressure someone into submission?
Did they find "spiritual" reasons for separating you from your family, or alienating you from your spouse?
If they ever finally admitted to committing some sin, did they admit it in such general terms that you couldn't specifically
know what it was they were admitting?
In the process of "confession," did they still find some detail that either made them look good or you look bad?
Did you feel as though, as long as you were in this group, you were on an emotional roller-coaster controlled by your leader's approval or disapproval of you which could change
at any moment?
If you answered "yes" to all of these questions, then you, my friend, belonged to a highly manipulative group.
If it claimed to be a Christian group, or fellowship, or church, then it was also very, spiritually abusive. Biblically speaking, it never qualified as being what it claimed to be.
As Christians, we find it difficult to believe that our brothers & sisters in Christ would ever act this way & this
difficulty causes us to drop our guard & to be more trusting w/some of our fellow-believers than we should be.
Because we live in a fallen world, people, even Christians, may try
to manipulate us. In such situations we must know how to say "no" w/out feeling guilty.
By Hook or By Crook: How Cults Lure Christians, by Harold Bussell.
(New York: McCracken Press, 1993), p. 64. Previously published as Unholy Devotion: Why Cults Lure Christians, (Zondervan,
1983).]
The sad fact is, many Christians are persistently guilty of Spiritual Abuse & Spiritual Abuse is based on manipulation. W/out manipulation, it couldn't exist.
"Manipulative Techniques"
I'm using the word "manipulation" here in the sense provided by Webster's second definition of the
verb "manipulate:"
"to manage
or control artfully or by shrewd use of influence, often in an unfair or fraudulent way" (New World Dictionary, Third College Edition, 1988, p. 823).
By definition, this kind of manipulation is deceptive & the manipulation involved in Spiritual Abuse is especially cruel because it takes advantage of a person's deepest
needs & highest ideals.
Each characteristic of Spiritual Abuse is manipulative, but the following prominent manipulative techniques employed by spiritually abusive groups deserve special notice:
An artificially loving, sometimes selective recruitment process.
In a spiritually abusive group, the manipulation begins the moment you set foot in the door. Newcomers are treated differently from those who are already enmeshed in
the group.
New people receive either more attention, or a different kind of attention,
which often seems so nice & loving, even wonderful! But the new person doesn't realize that this
level of treatment is special.
He or she is frequently led to believe that this is how everyone in the group is treated. This
encourages him or her to have the mistaken expectation that such flattery will continue.
In the field of cult studies, this is referred to as "love bombing," so-named
because some cults truly go overboard in showering new members with attention & affection. (Some have even offered free sex to new members.)
Love bombing has proven to be a very effective method of recruiting new members,
accelerating their assimilation into the group & securing a deep level of commitment.
Who doesn't
want to be loved? Who would want to lose a truly loving community of people once they found it? And which one of us
would not be prepared to make personal sacrifices in order to keep it?
Another technique used w/great effectiveness has been selective recruitment. In many
groups, not just anyone can join. A newcomer must first meet w/some level of group leadership, who will determine whether
the prospective new recruit is "serious
enough" to be admitted.
What's actually happening is that the individual is being evaluated for his or her level of compliance. Can this
person be controlled? Will we be able to mold this person into one of us, someone who will submit to our agenda?
Of course, they don't actually speak, or even always think, in these terms. The leadership may themselves be self-deceived enough to believe that all they're really looking for is "Christian commitment." In a spiritually abusive
environment, subsequent events will demonstrate
otherwise & will show that the real goal was control all along.
When a person makes it thru this process & is allowed to join, it can be almost as flattering as "love bombing." It gives a person a feeling of having "made the cut." It also increases the perception that the person has found
others who really understand him or her, especially the desire to truly follow God.
Finally it helps the leadership to erect
a wall of secrecy around the group. Not "just anyone"
is able to join, so therefore not "just anyone" can really know what goes on inside.
The mutual understanding from the very beginning is almost always that outsiders can't & will not understand the inner workings of the group, so the screening process protects the group from the outside world, while simultaneously initiating new members into its culture of secrecy.
This culture of secrecy is presented as entirely benign. Members are told that it exists
only for their own "protection." The only thing it protects members from is the truth & this is a very dangerous sort of "protection."
i.e., In some groups, when people are kicked out, the whole ordeal is very "hush-hush." One day an entire
family might be part of the group; the next day they're gone. Questions aren't encouraged.
Members are told not to contact the former members. If they want to know anything, they're told to ask the leader,
who has all the info & can slant it any way he pleases. But to question the leader is to risk one's own ostracism,
so few members ever do.
The former members' pain over being forced out is compounded by the pain of isolation that is produced by the secrecy.
In one semi-communal group I know, whole families have to pack their belongings & move out of the apartment building
when the leader orders them to. Everyone in the apartment complex can see what's going on.
Far from "protecting" these people's reputations, these humiliating rituals only confirm in the minds of those who remain that something must be wrong w/these people, or they wouldn't
have been asked to leave.
When you see people in a religious system being secretive, watch out. People don't hide what is
appropriate; they hide what is inappropriate.
One reason spiritually abusive families & churches are secretive is because they're so image
conscious. ...
Another reason for
secrecy in a church is that the leadership has a condescending, negative view of the laity.
This results in conspiracies on the leadership level. They tell themselves, "People aren't mature enough to handle truth." This is patronizing at best. ...
[David Johnson and Jeff
VanVonderen, The Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse, p. 78.]
I was introduced to my spiritually abusive
group in 1987 after an extensive screening process.
It involved several weeks of phone calls w/the leader before I was
allowed to attend the first meeting. Since I eventually joined on the premise that I was coming to a "Christian therapy"
group (although over time the leader tried
to evolve it into a "church") & I'd never attended
that kind of group before (so I didn't know
what to expect), the fact that there was a screening
process didn't seem all that strange to me.
I've since learned of other groups, which claim right up-front
to be churches & yet employ a similar screening process w/the same effect. New members feel specially selected, rather than merely "settled for."
Given the highly confrontational brand of "therapy" that the leader
practiced, it wasn't too long before I witnessed harrowing scenes in our "therapy" group meetings.
But because I was being treated special & because I was impressed w/the leader's seeming competence
in psychology (which later turned out to be
a charade), I didn't consider what I was observing to
be "abuse."
I thought, "Surely the leader knows these people better than I do & surely
he knows what he's doing!" The artificially-loving recruitment process was keeping me in line from the very beginning.
Because secrets were being kept in the name of "protection," I was less suspicious of the leader's hidden agenda than I should've been.
When this agenda finally became obvious, I realized that we'd all been
tricked into placing blind trust in a man who really didn't have the training, experience, or personal integrity to practice therapy, or any other kind of counseling.
We had all been seduced into placing our trust in him through a carefully-orchestrated process, patiently carried out over weeks & months, beginning w/our initiation into the group.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|